Vice.com recently posted this great video of famed street photographer Bruce Gilden critiquing photographs that were submitted specifically for this purpose. The result is pretty wonderful, which is a little unexpected for me. I’m not a big fan of Bruce Gilden’s photography and even less of the way he does photography. But his critique of photography seems to coincide with my own views to a remarkable degree. In other words, I don’t care for the photographs he makes but I love how he talks and thinks about photography. He’s the complete inverse of Henri Cartier-Bresson, in my book.
Plagiarism in the Visual Arts
Whenever you start teaching at a new college or university one of the first things you’ll have to do is attend a seminar on the institution’s academic policies, including plagiarism. I’ve been through this several times over the years and yet I’m still able to confound the presenter when I point out the special difficulties of detecting plagiarism in the visual arts. It’s as if they’ve never thought of the problem before.
I’ve just added a batch of new film frames to my collection of EPS downloads. List below.
Click on any of the images above to see the full gallery.
I am making these film rebate files available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits all uses – even commercial uses – as long as you give attribution.
Not long ago I was “invited” – via email spam, no less – to submit photographs for inclusion in the “International Masters of Photography” book. Even though I didn’t fall for that one and even though I reported it as spam to the spam-friendly host (aitcom.net) I’ve been getting more dubious “offers” from the same IP address range. Continue reading
I recently received an email from an outfit called Dorrance Publishing regarding my textbook A Semester of Photoshop. The subject line of the email was the rather alarming “Your Copyright Registration with the Library of Congress” and I first assumed it was the Copyright Office informing me of a problem with my registration. A quick glance (after opening the email in a web browser, since Dorrance is one of those clueless entities that sends email in HTML-only format) was enough to reveal that Dorrance is some kind of publishing company kindly alerting me to the fact that my book is a “candidate for publication” with them.
An unsolicited email with an alarmist subject line and evasively-worded opening paragraph set off a few alarm bells here, to put it mildly. So off to the search engines I did go… and I was not disappointed. Continue reading
Here’s an interesting article on what, if it catches on, could be a disturbing trend in wedding photography: A contract clause (buried in the fine print, naturally) that prohibits the customer from posting negative reviews. (You can read the story at www.wftv.com/news/news/local/action-9-investigates-growing-threats-against-onli/nYrBw/.)
Stop it, people! Stop putting QR codes on web sites!
QR codes are those now-ubiquitous 2-dimensional barcodes that appear in magazines, advertising posters, etc. like the example shown at right. Yes, I know I am, in fact, "Putting a QR code on a web site by using this illustration, but that’s the point: I’m doing it as an illustration, not with any expectation of anyone using it.
QR codes are intended for print media. The user sees the QR code, scans (takes a photo of it) with a phone or tablet and is then whisked away effortlessly to the web site linked in the code without having to type in a URL. (The longer the site’s URL the more advantageous a QR code is because few people will make the effort to type in a long string of text.) There’s no point in putting a QR code on a web site because the person seeing it is, by definition, already on the web and doesn’t need any special technology to avoid typing: An ordinary link does the job.
(And if you use an image of a QR code as a clickable link on your web site you’re a wanker of the highest order.)
Kodak Instamatic Camera
Image from Wikimedia – Creative Commons License
According to the George Eastman House blog, March 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the Kodak Instamatic family of cameras. These cameras truly revolutionized photography for the masses, opened a path toward unprecedented profits for Kodak and… ultimately led to the company’s demise. (True, Kodak isn’t gone yet, but as a photographic entity it might as well be at this point).
I’m convinced: Advertising on Facebook is useless.
Part of the attraction, supposedly, for advertising on Facebook is that they know so much about all their users – through various, sometimes ethically-questionable means – that your advertising will be precisely targeted to precisely those people it will be most likely to interest. If that were really the case I can see why an advertiser would go for it: There’s no wasted money/effort directed at people uninterested in, or actually hostile to, your product or service. If that’s how it worked it would be great. But it doesn’t work.
DP Review just posted a news article titled “Toshiba shows-off Lytro-style Light Field module for mobiles”, fulfilling a prediction I made in my original Lytro article about a year ago. Details: The 8-megapixel sensor reportedly delivers 2-megapixel images, which is a better ratio than I had hypothesized but that appears to be a case of different design trade-offs according to DP Review.
Read this article: Lytro camera for Toshiba mobile phones.
Addendum, 04 May, 2013
Addendum, 06 December, 2013