Latest Self-Publishing Scheme: publishwholesale.com

Though it’s a truism that one of the surest signs of a business you want to avoid is that their advertising takes the form of spam email, it’s still worth repeating from time to time. (A couple of earlier posts on this subject, regarding Dorrance Publishing and International Masters, might be worth a look at this point…)

The latest turd to hit my inbox offered “World class publishing for less than anyone for over two decades”, a jumble of near-word-salad that can hardly be encouraging to anyone with enough literacy and intelligence to write anything actually worth publishing. Perhaps, like the famous Nigerian email scams, the obviousness is intended to quickly narrow down the field of potential “clients” to those who aren’t very bright.

According to this discussion board They’ve been spamming at least since 2011, hardly a sign of a successful legitimate business. Publishwholesale.com appears to be owned by a company called Accurance which was given a “Not Recommended” rating by Preditors and Editors (that’s a link to the archive.org cache of their page; PDF version here) and there’s a useful discussion about them at Absolute Write.

As is common, they appear to have seeded the web with a lot of links, YouTube videos, etc. to minimize search engine results that point to complaints, criticisms and questions about the legitimacy of their business. (Besides their business names, Accurance and Publish Wholesale, it’s worth searching on the phone numbers they’ve used in their spams, 727-550-6268 and 812-509-3342.)

Other suspicious notes:
• They sent their email through a different internet provider than the one they use for hosting their web site, a technique often used by spammers to insulate their web presence from take-down by a hosting provider who objects to spamming. Even if their email provider shuts them down for spam their web site will (they hope) remain on line while they find a new email provider.
• Their domain registration is anonymized to conceal its true owner. This is very suspicious behavior for a business site. In fact, their web provider, websitewelcome.com, has their domain name cloaked through an anonymizing service! That’s a huge red flag.
• They sent their spam to the “postmaster” role account for my robertstech.com domain, which means they scraped the address from somewhere, most likely the ARIN database of domain names. Legal but pretty slimy.

Scam Complaints and Warnings About Accurance and Publishwholesale.com on the Web:

RULE 5: The scam that’s entirely legal is the most dangerous kind, because even if you identify and locate the scammer you have no recourse (except breaking the law yourself, which is never a good idea).

Standard Disclaimer: Can it be a "scam" if it’s legal?

The answer is Yes, in my opinion. And in the opinion of the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. 1st Circuit Court.

Here’s a good example of a legal scam:

It’s the “free” home alarm system. The target (customer) is first regaled with horror stories of break-ins and “home invasions”. Then they’re offered an alarm system for free. What’s not free, of course, is the mandatory monthly monitoring fee, which may be much higher than the going rate. And the length of the agreement can be longer than usual. Perhaps with a heavy penalty for early termination. There may also be a hefty fee for removal of the alarm system upon discontinuing service (part of the reason the system and installation were free in the first place may be because the alarm company retains ownership of the hardware). But that’s all in the fine print and if the customer is frightened enough they won’t notice it.

All perfectly legal, but no reasonable person would not call it a scam. In fact, the Federal Trade Commission explicitly uses the word "scam" to describe the above scenario.

The U.S. 1st Circuit court has found that the word "scam" does not necessarily imply anything illegal:

Beginning with the statement itself, we observe that the word “scam” does not have a precise meaning. As the district judge said in his bench ruling, “it means different things to different people … and there is not a single usage in common phraseology. While some connotations of the word may encompass criminal behavior, others do not.”
   — McCabe vs Rattiner

This entry was posted in Academics, Publishing, scam, spam. Bookmark the permalink.

 

Click here to enable the Facebook 'Like' button

Comments are closed.